Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Comodo
Comodo CIS Bug fix policy
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trident" data-source="post: 1100284" data-attributes="member: 99014"><p>It’s ok to make personal statements, such as saying that Comodo is working on your system or that you are not experiencing any of the “officially documented” 70 or 500+ bugs.</p><p></p><p>It’s not ok to <strong>persistently</strong> claim that others, which have put a lot of hard work in their products, and keep doing so 24/7, are a “failure” or to claim that Comodo is superior to them. These are the sort of statements that would require proof, and a video where one sample wasn’t detected, sorry, but it doesn’t constitute for evidence.</p><p>The same prompt that Comodo issues in this case (which is presented as the “unique”, “unbeatable” security module), could have been issued by the “oblivious to malware” product as well, had it been configured to do so.</p><p>If that wasn’t possible, then we wouldn’t have this conversation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trident, post: 1100284, member: 99014"] It’s ok to make personal statements, such as saying that Comodo is working on your system or that you are not experiencing any of the “officially documented” 70 or 500+ bugs. It’s not ok to [B]persistently[/B] claim that others, which have put a lot of hard work in their products, and keep doing so 24/7, are a “failure” or to claim that Comodo is superior to them. These are the sort of statements that would require proof, and a video where one sample wasn’t detected, sorry, but it doesn’t constitute for evidence. The same prompt that Comodo issues in this case (which is presented as the “unique”, “unbeatable” security module), could have been issued by the “oblivious to malware” product as well, had it been configured to do so. If that wasn’t possible, then we wouldn’t have this conversation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
