Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Trident" data-source="post: 1100296" data-attributes="member: 99014">Don’t make me go look for the post where it was said, if necessary, I will find them. I would rather not have to go through this “hell”, but if needs must.Typical on Comodo threads. Something is said, then we turn around “no, we didn’t say this, we said that”. Lab tests are evidence that “Comodo is great”, but they are not evidence that others are great too (having the same result), others are “prone to failure” (bazang words) and “oblivious to malware” (cruelsister statement in the end of a recent video which as well, I can link if needs must).It’s ok for Comodo to protect users via prompts and alerts, but it’s not OK for Eset to do so (chuck57 words).Leo’s video is accepted as evidence, but Neil Rubenking’s result and review is discarded. No idea why Leo would he more credible, they are both literally in the same field. Leo relies on sponsorships, the other one is on salary with Ziff Davis, owners of Vipre.Specially formed and shaped truths, once again, morphed as convenient, when convenient to prove a point, namely that “water is dry” and “black is not black, but it’s white”.This is not from now, it has always been the case.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Trident, post: 1100296, member: 99014"] Don’t make me go look for the post where it was said, if necessary, I will find them. I would rather not have to go through this “hell”, but if needs must. Typical on Comodo threads. Something is said, then we turn around “no, we didn’t say this, we said that”. Lab tests are evidence that “Comodo is great”, but they are not evidence that others are great too (having the same result), others are “prone to failure” (bazang words) and “oblivious to malware” (cruelsister statement in the end of a recent video which as well, I can link if needs must). It’s ok for Comodo to protect users via prompts and alerts, but it’s not OK for Eset to do so (chuck57 words). Leo’s video is accepted as evidence, but Neil Rubenking’s result and review is discarded. No idea why Leo would he more credible, they are both literally in the same field. Leo relies on sponsorships, the other one is on salary with Ziff Davis, owners of Vipre. Specially formed and shaped truths, once again, morphed as convenient, when convenient to prove a point, namely that “water is dry” and “black is not black, but it’s white”. This is not from now, it has always been the case. [/QUOTE]

Verification