Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Trident" data-source="post: 1100393" data-attributes="member: 99014">There are not that many tests done over the years. AV-comparatives does 4-5 tests a year, and there are 3-4 other labs that do the same. Over the course of 10 years, there are no more than 100-200 tests, most of the times Norton misses 1-2 samples. So thousands of samples is very over-exaggerated. On many test, it doesn’t miss anything.Don’t exaggerate <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😀" title="Grinning face&nbsp; &nbsp; :grinning:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" data-shortname=":grinning:" />There is also no guarantee that it’s not the same sample missed on 2-3 labs tests. They do not supply any additional information to non-paying consumers, it’s all just for the paying vendors.That perfect 6 is actually 5.something and there are differences, but they don’t even wanna reveal that. But also, Comodo does not participate on these tests. On the one that’s been referenced, nobody apart from Eset missed anythingThat’s his protocol, he doesn’t document them. The AV labs don’t document anything either, it is a trust me, I’m an engineer sort of situation.A lot of the so-called “documented” tests that I’ve seen have been bad as well, many of these channels are in it for the quick buck and nothing more than that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Trident, post: 1100393, member: 99014"] There are not that many tests done over the years. AV-comparatives does 4-5 tests a year, and there are 3-4 other labs that do the same. Over the course of 10 years, there are no more than 100-200 tests, most of the times Norton misses 1-2 samples. So thousands of samples is very over-exaggerated. On many test, it doesn’t miss anything. Don’t exaggerate 😀 There is also no guarantee that it’s not the same sample missed on 2-3 labs tests. They do not supply any additional information to non-paying consumers, it’s all just for the paying vendors. That perfect 6 is actually 5.something and there are differences, but they don’t even wanna reveal that. But also, Comodo does not participate on these tests. On the one that’s been referenced, nobody apart from Eset missed anything That’s his protocol, he doesn’t document them. The AV labs don’t document anything either, it is a trust me, I’m an engineer sort of situation. A lot of the so-called “documented” tests that I’ve seen have been bad as well, many of these channels are in it for the quick buck and nothing more than that. [/QUOTE]

Verification