Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Decopi" data-source="post: 1100883" data-attributes="member: 67091">In the real and normal world, security software is NOT based on the opinion of one or a few anonymous people on social networks, people who never present credentials about their supposed knowledge, people who are not experts as they never present protocols about their procedures (which makes any kind of universal reproduction of any test and conclusion unfeasible / unverifiable). No mentally normal person would use security software based on non-expert youtube videos, or based on non-expert opinions on social networks.In the real and normal world, security software is based on official laboratory tests, or on expert reviews and tests, experts which are publicly known in the market, and follow professional and technical protocols in their evaluation procedures.Comodo has had no market share for decades, and its own official forum is full of complaints, and endless reports of unfixed bugs (a community that today is almost non-existent compared to years ago). Comodo&#039;s own CEO, Comodo staff and Comodo fanatics all them publicly admit the existence of bugs, and all of them (irresponsibly and immorally) confirm that bugs are not going to be fixed (maybe that&#039;s why Comodo also abandoned tests in large labs years ago). No surprise that since decades the internet is full of negative criticisms and complaints against Comodo, confirmed by the vast majority of negative reviews and tests made by the recognized experts in the market.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Decopi, post: 1100883, member: 67091"] In the real and normal world, security software is NOT based on the opinion of one or a few anonymous people on social networks, people who never present credentials about their supposed knowledge, people who are not experts as they never present protocols about their procedures (which makes any kind of universal reproduction of any test and conclusion unfeasible / unverifiable). No mentally normal person would use security software based on non-expert youtube videos, or based on non-expert opinions on social networks. In the real and normal world, security software is based on official laboratory tests, or on expert reviews and tests, experts which are publicly known in the market, and follow professional and technical protocols in their evaluation procedures. Comodo has had no market share for decades, and its own official forum is full of complaints, and endless reports of unfixed bugs (a community that today is almost non-existent compared to years ago). Comodo's own CEO, Comodo staff and Comodo fanatics all them publicly admit the existence of bugs, and all of them (irresponsibly and immorally) confirm that bugs are not going to be fixed (maybe that's why Comodo also abandoned tests in large labs years ago). No surprise that since decades the internet is full of negative criticisms and complaints against Comodo, confirmed by the vast majority of negative reviews and tests made by the recognized experts in the market. [/QUOTE]

Verification