Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Comodo Firewall 10 Setup
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Decopi" data-source="post: 701921" data-attributes="member: 67091"><p>[USER=37647]@shmu26[/USER], thanks!</p><p></p><p>I agree with you.</p><p></p><p>However, after reading lot of CS' comments, and watched most of her videos, I didn't find this kind of distinction in her arguments.</p><p>The message is always loud and clear: CF+CS' settings alone is enough. There is no distinction between hard drive/memory dangers, or browsers/online dangers.</p><p>For her, I am sure CF is enough, because she is a security expert.</p><p>For me, perhaps also is enough, because I know a little how to protect my browser without AV/AM.</p><p>However, what about average users? How can CS, a security expert, can recommend to average users that CF+CS' settings is enough... specifically for browsers, online-dangers, phishing, scams, fake webpages etc etc etc?</p><p></p><p>I am not saying CS is wrong.</p><p>I am saying that for today zero-day attacks, or for future zero-day attacks trough browsers and online-activity, I don't know/understand how CF+CS' settings will deal with this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Decopi, post: 701921, member: 67091"] [USER=37647]@shmu26[/USER], thanks! I agree with you. However, after reading lot of CS' comments, and watched most of her videos, I didn't find this kind of distinction in her arguments. The message is always loud and clear: CF+CS' settings alone is enough. There is no distinction between hard drive/memory dangers, or browsers/online dangers. For her, I am sure CF is enough, because she is a security expert. For me, perhaps also is enough, because I know a little how to protect my browser without AV/AM. However, what about average users? How can CS, a security expert, can recommend to average users that CF+CS' settings is enough... specifically for browsers, online-dangers, phishing, scams, fake webpages etc etc etc? I am not saying CS is wrong. I am saying that for today zero-day attacks, or for future zero-day attacks trough browsers and online-activity, I don't know/understand how CF+CS' settings will deal with this. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top