Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Comodo Firewall 10 Setup
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Decopi" data-source="post: 701985" data-attributes="member: 67091"><p>[USER=32547]@AtlBo[/USER],</p><p></p><p>QIHOO:</p><p>You are right, for 50MB I stay with AVAST, good enough for me in case of CF' false negatives.</p><p></p><p>PROTECTED FOLDERS/FILES:</p><p>Cloud back up is for me the best and simplest solution.</p><p>I just asked about HIPS, only because wanted to know/understand the subject.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In my ignorant opinion, most of the AV/AM are still more focused in computers/devices protection (which is good), but less focused in internet protection (which is bad).</p><p>Browsers also are not helping, because they depend on ads + trackers + privacy invasion etc. There are a few browsers focused on security/privacy, but the price for users is still too high (bad performance, lot of RAM, CPU, slow surfing, no extensions or bad extensions etc). You are right about Dragon.</p><p>As I said, I believe that browsers, online-activity, internet etc are going to be the major focus of zero-day attacks, increasingly in quantity, quality, harm, danger etc. And sadly, browsers and AM/AV are always behind and late compared to attackers.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Today after your first comment, I tested VS and WebFilering "off". And I got a BSOD (first BSOD in past 12 months).</p><p>I don't have time and interest on this CF' options, but both options have not RAM/CPU impact in my tests. So, in order to avoid and solve my BSOD, I decided to keep "on".</p><p></p><p>My final verdict is that CF as a firewall is not something special, and Windows firewall can perfectly do the job. But two things:</p><p>a) CF has a very low RAM/CPU impact (fact very important to me).</p><p>b) CS' settings are just absolutely fantastic great and good, transforming something no special (CF) into very special.</p><p></p><p>I still just would like to understand/know, why CS recommends CF alone without AM/AV, in the case for browsers, online-activity, internet etc.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>101% agree with you.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I thank you. Another two tips:</p><p>a) JSGUARD (tiny lightweight add-on/extension, excellent complement for BD add-on/extension, focused in fighting malicious scripts).</p><p>b) WebApiManager (first add-on/extension able to block APIS).</p><p>PS: Don't need to install BD in order to use the BD add-on/extension. Are two things, working independently. I use the BD add-on without the BD AV.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Decopi, post: 701985, member: 67091"] [USER=32547]@AtlBo[/USER], QIHOO: You are right, for 50MB I stay with AVAST, good enough for me in case of CF' false negatives. PROTECTED FOLDERS/FILES: Cloud back up is for me the best and simplest solution. I just asked about HIPS, only because wanted to know/understand the subject. In my ignorant opinion, most of the AV/AM are still more focused in computers/devices protection (which is good), but less focused in internet protection (which is bad). Browsers also are not helping, because they depend on ads + trackers + privacy invasion etc. There are a few browsers focused on security/privacy, but the price for users is still too high (bad performance, lot of RAM, CPU, slow surfing, no extensions or bad extensions etc). You are right about Dragon. As I said, I believe that browsers, online-activity, internet etc are going to be the major focus of zero-day attacks, increasingly in quantity, quality, harm, danger etc. And sadly, browsers and AM/AV are always behind and late compared to attackers. Today after your first comment, I tested VS and WebFilering "off". And I got a BSOD (first BSOD in past 12 months). I don't have time and interest on this CF' options, but both options have not RAM/CPU impact in my tests. So, in order to avoid and solve my BSOD, I decided to keep "on". My final verdict is that CF as a firewall is not something special, and Windows firewall can perfectly do the job. But two things: a) CF has a very low RAM/CPU impact (fact very important to me). b) CS' settings are just absolutely fantastic great and good, transforming something no special (CF) into very special. I still just would like to understand/know, why CS recommends CF alone without AM/AV, in the case for browsers, online-activity, internet etc. 101% agree with you. I thank you. Another two tips: a) JSGUARD (tiny lightweight add-on/extension, excellent complement for BD add-on/extension, focused in fighting malicious scripts). b) WebApiManager (first add-on/extension able to block APIS). PS: Don't need to install BD in order to use the BD add-on/extension. Are two things, working independently. I use the BD add-on without the BD AV. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top