Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Comodo Firewall 10 Setup
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Decopi" data-source="post: 702379" data-attributes="member: 67091"><p>Yes, I agree.</p><p>However, the rest of your comment is your personal interpretation. And I respect that. But when we make recommendations, in this case security recommendations, we can't be ambiguous, and interpretations are forbidden in this field.</p><p></p><p>Again, CS recommends CF without AM/AV.</p><p>She never approached explanations about browsers, online-activity, internet dangers etc.</p><p>And this is my question.</p><p></p><p>Again, please, don't misunderstand me!</p><p>A question is not a critic, neither a personal attack.</p><p>If I am questioning is because I read a lot of CS' commentaries, watched lot of her videos, I love CS, I use her CF' settings, I recommend, I even agree that for computer/devices CF might be enough etc... but I just don't understand CS' argument regarding browsers, online-activity, internet dangers etc.</p><p>I confess that I also don't understand why most of the CF+CS' settings users also have not this same question as I have. Most users here just accept CF as enough.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Out of my question.</p><p>I didn't ask about AM/AV.</p><p>I just asked about CS' recommendation.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agree.</p><p>But CS doesn't discriminate users when she share her comments. Her argument seems to be generalist, for any user.</p><p>And I trust CS. I know she has an answer for her recommendation. I just want to know/understand her recommendation, specifically regarding browsers, online-activity, internet dangers etc.</p><p></p><p>Meltdown and Spectre are good samples of dangers that could arise from a simple javascript. Both bugs can bypass virtual machines, sandboxing etc. This is exactly what I mean when I say that browsers, online-activity, internet dangers should be the main focus. And this is the reason I want to understand CS' arguments.</p><p></p><p>But [USER=11847]@josinpaul[/USER], thank anyway for your answers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Decopi, post: 702379, member: 67091"] Yes, I agree. However, the rest of your comment is your personal interpretation. And I respect that. But when we make recommendations, in this case security recommendations, we can't be ambiguous, and interpretations are forbidden in this field. Again, CS recommends CF without AM/AV. She never approached explanations about browsers, online-activity, internet dangers etc. And this is my question. Again, please, don't misunderstand me! A question is not a critic, neither a personal attack. If I am questioning is because I read a lot of CS' commentaries, watched lot of her videos, I love CS, I use her CF' settings, I recommend, I even agree that for computer/devices CF might be enough etc... but I just don't understand CS' argument regarding browsers, online-activity, internet dangers etc. I confess that I also don't understand why most of the CF+CS' settings users also have not this same question as I have. Most users here just accept CF as enough. Out of my question. I didn't ask about AM/AV. I just asked about CS' recommendation. Agree. But CS doesn't discriminate users when she share her comments. Her argument seems to be generalist, for any user. And I trust CS. I know she has an answer for her recommendation. I just want to know/understand her recommendation, specifically regarding browsers, online-activity, internet dangers etc. Meltdown and Spectre are good samples of dangers that could arise from a simple javascript. Both bugs can bypass virtual machines, sandboxing etc. This is exactly what I mean when I say that browsers, online-activity, internet dangers should be the main focus. And this is the reason I want to understand CS' arguments. But [USER=11847]@josinpaul[/USER], thank anyway for your answers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top