Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Comodo Firewall Bypassing a Bypass
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 1106475" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>Two examples were already posted.</p><p>1. Comodo challenge.</p><p>2. DLL hijacking used in the bypass. It was not contained and allowed to run TDSSKiller. So, DLL hijacking vector is not sufficiently covered by Comodo.</p><p></p><p>No offence. By writing that many fileless exploits/malware can bypass Comodo (also in your settings), I did mean the attackers who are motivated to target Comodo users. It does not mean that Comodo is routinely bypassed in the wild, but rather that is not so strong to use the reg tweak that disables LUA. This is probably the reason that Comodo does not use this tweak, and it was not recommended by the Comodo staff - even if it could improve the containment.</p><p>If I correctly recall, your settings do not use HIPS and you do not tweak the Script Analysis Settings. So, many fileless attacks will not be contained, as in the case of Comodo challenge. After applying HIPS and Script Analysis Settings, Comodo can probably block most of the fileless attacks (like some variants of Comodo challenge), but loses much of its usefulness.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 1106475, member: 32260"] Two examples were already posted. 1. Comodo challenge. 2. DLL hijacking used in the bypass. It was not contained and allowed to run TDSSKiller. So, DLL hijacking vector is not sufficiently covered by Comodo. No offence. By writing that many fileless exploits/malware can bypass Comodo (also in your settings), I did mean the attackers who are motivated to target Comodo users. It does not mean that Comodo is routinely bypassed in the wild, but rather that is not so strong to use the reg tweak that disables LUA. This is probably the reason that Comodo does not use this tweak, and it was not recommended by the Comodo staff - even if it could improve the containment. If I correctly recall, your settings do not use HIPS and you do not tweak the Script Analysis Settings. So, many fileless attacks will not be contained, as in the case of Comodo challenge. After applying HIPS and Script Analysis Settings, Comodo can probably block most of the fileless attacks (like some variants of Comodo challenge), but loses much of its usefulness. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top