Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Comodo Firewall Bypassing a Bypass
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 1108799" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>Any method that blocks macros (also my DocumentsAntiExploit tool) can prevent that attack.</p><p>I repeated the test with an enabled Internet connection (I am not sure If VirusScope uses a cloud backend):</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]286383[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Viruscope could not block the containment bypass, but it has some chances to mitigate some malicious actions of the payload. In my test, I used an unknown but benign payload "New GUI". I initially disabled the Internet connections to be sure that Comodo could not add the file to the trusted group.</p><p>I used hardened [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] settings (all Script Analysis settings enabled).</p><p></p><p>Comodo on reasonable settings <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong>cannot contain such attacks</strong></span>, but it can detect the payload by signatures or some malicious actions can be blocked by VirusScope/HIPS.</p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 168, 133)">The attack can be contained using a virtual desktop to open the weaponized document. </span></p><p></p><p>Edit.</p><p>I wrote "containment bypass" but (more precisely) it is an auto-containment bypass.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 1108799, member: 32260"] Any method that blocks macros (also my DocumentsAntiExploit tool) can prevent that attack. I repeated the test with an enabled Internet connection (I am not sure If VirusScope uses a cloud backend): [ATTACH type="full" alt="1732131314874.png"]286383[/ATTACH] Viruscope could not block the containment bypass, but it has some chances to mitigate some malicious actions of the payload. In my test, I used an unknown but benign payload "New GUI". I initially disabled the Internet connections to be sure that Comodo could not add the file to the trusted group. I used hardened [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] settings (all Script Analysis settings enabled). Comodo on reasonable settings [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B]cannot contain such attacks[/B][/COLOR], but it can detect the payload by signatures or some malicious actions can be blocked by VirusScope/HIPS. [COLOR=rgb(0, 168, 133)]The attack can be contained using a virtual desktop to open the weaponized document. [/COLOR] Edit. I wrote "containment bypass" but (more precisely) it is an auto-containment bypass. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top