Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bazang" data-source="post: 1109799" data-attributes="member: 114717">I said it from the beginning.People will never be accountable or take responsibility unless it is imposed upon them very forcefully by individual governments and international agreements.For every 1 Euro spent on the user side of enforcing security, one must spend 10 to 50 Euros on the cyber criminal side (pursuing them via law enforcement). Those numbers are a particular government&#039;s internal statistics.The answer is to impose very strict security at the device level upon users. It means that &quot;users want to use stuff&quot; will not happen on such devices. They shall be locked out of doing all the things that they are allowed to do now, which are responsible for the vast majority of security incidents.Such a change in protection paradigm and model shall never happen. It is easier to just leave users to their own whims and make profit from people being people.The average user does not care about security. So I have no compunction whatsoever about allowing them to destroy their life savings because they are &quot;users that want to use stuff.&quot; For families that have children and the parents allow children to be unsupervised, they get what they permitted to happen. It is the same as those obese people. Nobody forced them to stuff their faces and over eat. They did it to themselves.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bazang, post: 1109799, member: 114717"] I said it from the beginning. People will never be accountable or take responsibility unless it is imposed upon them very forcefully by individual governments and international agreements. For every 1 Euro spent on the user side of enforcing security, one must spend 10 to 50 Euros on the cyber criminal side (pursuing them via law enforcement). Those numbers are a particular government's internal statistics. The answer is to impose very strict security at the device level upon users. It means that "users want to use stuff" will not happen on such devices. They shall be locked out of doing all the things that they are allowed to do now, which are responsible for the vast majority of security incidents. Such a change in protection paradigm and model shall never happen. It is easier to just leave users to their own whims and make profit from people being people. The average user does not care about security. So I have no compunction whatsoever about allowing them to destroy their life savings because they are "users that want to use stuff." For families that have children and the parents allow children to be unsupervised, they get what they permitted to happen. It is the same as those obese people. Nobody forced them to stuff their faces and over eat. They did it to themselves. [/QUOTE]

Verification