Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Comodo Firewall vs a new Data Stealer
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trident" data-source="post: 1094505" data-attributes="member: 99014"><p>There were no alerts, prompts, ifs and buts. Upon launch, Norton, Avast, Bitdefender and Check Point Harmony automatically remediated the malware, with Harmony going as far as identifying the malware type, and not some generic name. Some of its components were first seen 20 days ago.</p><p></p><p>Trend Micro would have issued a warning not to run the file. The user can’t ignore this warning unless they try to run it second time, which they shouldn’t.</p><p></p><p>Kaspersky with a properly set-up application control/IDS would have blocked execution.</p><p></p><p>Microsoft Defender also dealt with the malware and tools from Andy Ful could have stopped the execution of LOLBins which is essential for the malware logical flow.</p><p></p><p>In addition, many products can be configured to display these prompts whether or not something is allowed to connect to the internet, it is not something unique to Comodo.</p><p></p><p>So I do not agree that only Comodo dealt with the malware or the way of dealing was in any way superior.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trident, post: 1094505, member: 99014"] There were no alerts, prompts, ifs and buts. Upon launch, Norton, Avast, Bitdefender and Check Point Harmony automatically remediated the malware, with Harmony going as far as identifying the malware type, and not some generic name. Some of its components were first seen 20 days ago. Trend Micro would have issued a warning not to run the file. The user can’t ignore this warning unless they try to run it second time, which they shouldn’t. Kaspersky with a properly set-up application control/IDS would have blocked execution. Microsoft Defender also dealt with the malware and tools from Andy Ful could have stopped the execution of LOLBins which is essential for the malware logical flow. In addition, many products can be configured to display these prompts whether or not something is allowed to connect to the internet, it is not something unique to Comodo. So I do not agree that only Comodo dealt with the malware or the way of dealing was in any way superior. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top