Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Decopi" data-source="post: 1094768" data-attributes="member: 67091">It&#039;s not me... it&#039;s reality that confirms the facts:If an user only activates Comodo&#039;s antivirus module... that user will have 100% chance of getting infected. We can confirm that fact by googling the web, but we can also confirm that fact with videos showing Comodo&#039;s antivirus failing, and even worse, the total lack of videos proving that the antivirus works also confirms its failure. By the way, that&#039;s the reason why the video posted in this thread is not using Comodo&#039;s antivirus... useless! Therefore, Comodo cannot be used to detect virus/malware.Without the antivirus, all the other Comodo&#039;s modules are nothing more than mere blockers. And every blocker, with or without database, with or without automation, is always dependent on the user.Therefore, in real world, Comodo is not an antivirus/antimalware, it&#039;s a blocker.Strengths or weaknesses are relative, depend on user profile. Blockers like Comodo are useful for 1% of the users (and they might talk about subjective strengths). In the other hand, blockers like Comodo are useless for 99% of the users (and they might see only weaknesses). The vast majority of users are unable to say what to block or allow. Also, there is no logic in using a blocker, when 99% of the users can use excellent real antivirus/antimalware, and for free!That fact was proven in real life, where Comodo was buried by the market. The concept never took off. 99% of users never heard about Comodo.Comodo is not successful. Comodo 2025 is a zombie, an abandon-ware from 2018, which was resuscitated, facelift, and renamed to &quot;2025&quot;. It&#039;s a dangerous software, full of unfixed bugs.For 1% of users who prefer to use blockers, Comodo can be useful. But that doesn&#039;t mean Comodo is a success.Comodo&#039;s database is absolutely poor, and it has already failed in the past. But even if it were a 100% perfect database, the real problem is that Comodo as a blocker only works when the user works.It&#039;s very important to always repeat that Comodo as a blocker can be useful for few users. But it&#039;s irresponsible to generalize presenting Comodo as an unbeatable complete security system, when Comodo is nothing more than an old layer of security, full of unfixed bugs.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Decopi, post: 1094768, member: 67091"] It's not me... it's reality that confirms the facts: If an user only activates Comodo's antivirus module... that user will have 100% chance of getting infected. We can confirm that fact by googling the web, but we can also confirm that fact with videos showing Comodo's antivirus failing, and even worse, the total lack of videos proving that the antivirus works also confirms its failure. By the way, that's the reason why the video posted in this thread is not using Comodo's antivirus... useless! Therefore, Comodo cannot be used to detect virus/malware. Without the antivirus, all the other Comodo's modules are nothing more than mere blockers. And every blocker, with or without database, with or without automation, is always dependent on the user. Therefore, in real world, Comodo is not an antivirus/antimalware, it's a blocker. Strengths or weaknesses are relative, depend on user profile. Blockers like Comodo are useful for 1% of the users (and they might talk about subjective strengths). In the other hand, blockers like Comodo are useless for 99% of the users (and they might see only weaknesses). The vast majority of users are unable to say what to block or allow. Also, there is no logic in using a blocker, when 99% of the users can use excellent real antivirus/antimalware, and for free! That fact was proven in real life, where Comodo was buried by the market. The concept never took off. 99% of users never heard about Comodo. Comodo is not successful. Comodo 2025 is a zombie, an abandon-ware from 2018, which was resuscitated, facelift, and renamed to "2025". It's a dangerous software, full of unfixed bugs. For 1% of users who prefer to use blockers, Comodo can be useful. But that doesn't mean Comodo is a success. Comodo's database is absolutely poor, and it has already failed in the past. But even if it were a 100% perfect database, the real problem is that Comodo as a blocker only works when the user works. It's very important to always repeat that Comodo as a blocker can be useful for few users. But it's irresponsible to generalize presenting Comodo as an unbeatable complete security system, when Comodo is nothing more than an old layer of security, full of unfixed bugs. [/QUOTE]

Verification