Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 114834" data-source="post: 1095191">This kind of posts feeds into that though, as it screams gender inequality. Instead of directly addressing the issues. Some members commenting took issue with the statement &quot;oblivious to malware&quot; made in the video, an unnecessary statement. Also a incorrect statement because simultaneously there was another thread with products stopping the sample, which ironically enough was not even being tested with real world testing to test the scope of the products abilities. This could have all been avoid without the comment. Matter of fact, it&#039;s best to test a product and let its results speak for itself. Less attention may be made to the thread but at least it would then be a more positive aspect. This responsibility lies in the hands of user testing and posting. I stepped in just because of part of that aspect. The improper testing but comments made. Then default deny topic comes up so I addressed that as well. CS is correct that testing of specific modules is still relevant as to how they perform should something slide by other modules or those modules be ineffective. It is not correct however to state a product fails without first properly testing all modules. It is also very incorrect to assume that just because a handful of users are using a guide to set up this installation of CIS that they can accurately handle the application if issues did arise. Since they lack understanding to set it up themselves and most likely lack deep understanding of the operating system and how the applications they choose to run interact with the OS. So basically a disclaimer stating that the product is not designed for novice to average users and lack of unnecessary untrue comments would stop a lot of this.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 114834, post: 1095191"] This kind of posts feeds into that though, as it screams gender inequality. Instead of directly addressing the issues. Some members commenting took issue with the statement "oblivious to malware" made in the video, an unnecessary statement. Also a incorrect statement because simultaneously there was another thread with products stopping the sample, which ironically enough was not even being tested with real world testing to test the scope of the products abilities. This could have all been avoid without the comment. Matter of fact, it's best to test a product and let its results speak for itself. Less attention may be made to the thread but at least it would then be a more positive aspect. This responsibility lies in the hands of user testing and posting. I stepped in just because of part of that aspect. The improper testing but comments made. Then default deny topic comes up so I addressed that as well. CS is correct that testing of specific modules is still relevant as to how they perform should something slide by other modules or those modules be ineffective. It is not correct however to state a product fails without first properly testing all modules. It is also very incorrect to assume that just because a handful of users are using a guide to set up this installation of CIS that they can accurately handle the application if issues did arise. Since they lack understanding to set it up themselves and most likely lack deep understanding of the operating system and how the applications they choose to run interact with the OS. So basically a disclaimer stating that the product is not designed for novice to average users and lack of unnecessary untrue comments would stop a lot of this. [/QUOTE]

Verification