Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Comodo Firewall vs a new Data Stealer
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cruelsister" data-source="post: 1095221" data-attributes="member: 7463"><p>Although I’d rather not intrude too much on his thread, your point does need clarification. When the video was made, the malware was D+1 with detections made by only a few products. As I was very surprised that VirusScope detected it, I also ran it against ESET which I still had on a VM from previous test. I didn't feel that a second video about it was either needed or appropriate.</p><p></p><p>ESET at that time (although it detects it now) neither stopped the packaging of the Data nor the transmission of this package out. With this fresh in my mind, that was what prompted the comment made in the video. No implication was intended that no other product would detect it (obvious from the VT results), and no inference should be drawn that other products wouldn’t add future detections.</p><p></p><p>m</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cruelsister, post: 1095221, member: 7463"] Although I’d rather not intrude too much on his thread, your point does need clarification. When the video was made, the malware was D+1 with detections made by only a few products. As I was very surprised that VirusScope detected it, I also ran it against ESET which I still had on a VM from previous test. I didn't feel that a second video about it was either needed or appropriate. ESET at that time (although it detects it now) neither stopped the packaging of the Data nor the transmission of this package out. With this fresh in my mind, that was what prompted the comment made in the video. No implication was intended that no other product would detect it (obvious from the VT results), and no inference should be drawn that other products wouldn’t add future detections. m [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
