Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Comodo Internet Security 11 Review | Test vs Malware
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 74454" data-source="post: 759924"><p>1. Samples... These are non verified to prove working/corrupted or even malware. All files renamed, points to a pre-packed sample pack, which are generally older samples with a few fresher mixed in among the corrupted/non working files and non malicious ones. How can one even pretend to determine a detection rate from this. </p><p></p><p>2. Knowledge of product... This tester has shown time and again to lack knowledge of products. The follower base he has, is mostly novices, then are now corrupted, by greed of business. As I guarantee this tester is not doing this to help his fellow man. </p><p></p><p>On demand products can and will pick up malicious items in another products quarantine and sandboxes. Not wiping Temp files before 2nd opinion scans is silly, and tools such as Ccleaner or windows built in will wipe those. I could literally sit here and tear this test to shreds, but have spoken enough of this subject. </p><p></p><p>3. Users such as myself, keep trying to drive this home, it works for about 4 hours, and then someone else will post another one. The users here, are responsible for the misinformation they spread. No one learns from this, it just confuses and sidelines real knowledge from being obtained. Until all work together to stop this, and place learning and sharing on the right track, it will continue as always.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 74454, post: 759924"] 1. Samples... These are non verified to prove working/corrupted or even malware. All files renamed, points to a pre-packed sample pack, which are generally older samples with a few fresher mixed in among the corrupted/non working files and non malicious ones. How can one even pretend to determine a detection rate from this. 2. Knowledge of product... This tester has shown time and again to lack knowledge of products. The follower base he has, is mostly novices, then are now corrupted, by greed of business. As I guarantee this tester is not doing this to help his fellow man. On demand products can and will pick up malicious items in another products quarantine and sandboxes. Not wiping Temp files before 2nd opinion scans is silly, and tools such as Ccleaner or windows built in will wipe those. I could literally sit here and tear this test to shreds, but have spoken enough of this subject. 3. Users such as myself, keep trying to drive this home, it works for about 4 hours, and then someone else will post another one. The users here, are responsible for the misinformation they spread. No one learns from this, it just confuses and sidelines real knowledge from being obtained. Until all work together to stop this, and place learning and sharing on the right track, it will continue as always. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top