Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Comodo Internet Security 11 Review | Test vs Malware
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Morphius" data-source="post: 760410" data-attributes="member: 749"><p>In my opinion this was a very simple scenario. This file was wrongly classified as trusted few years earlier. Now Comodo has tightened their whitelisting policy and it's a rare case to have malware on a white list. It has nothing to do with the TVL - this file was not signed and TVL was <strong>thoroughly</strong> reviewed few times in the past to exclude suspicious vendors and their policy to add vendors to TVL is different too (from my knowledge it doesn't require a fee to be a part of it). This happened and will happen - there will be no 100% default allow solution and no 100% default deny solution which operates using whitelist - it will have both false positives and negatives. Accepting that fact I still believe that Deafult Deny policy based on white-listing is still the most secure and convenient out there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Morphius, post: 760410, member: 749"] In my opinion this was a very simple scenario. This file was wrongly classified as trusted few years earlier. Now Comodo has tightened their whitelisting policy and it's a rare case to have malware on a white list. It has nothing to do with the TVL - this file was not signed and TVL was [B]thoroughly[/B] reviewed few times in the past to exclude suspicious vendors and their policy to add vendors to TVL is different too (from my knowledge it doesn't require a fee to be a part of it). This happened and will happen - there will be no 100% default allow solution and no 100% default deny solution which operates using whitelist - it will have both false positives and negatives. Accepting that fact I still believe that Deafult Deny policy based on white-listing is still the most secure and convenient out there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
