Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Comodo Internet Security 11 Review | Test vs Malware
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mahesh Sudula" data-source="post: 762925" data-attributes="member: 65679"><p>However i agree most of the vendors give it a clean sheet bindly by seeing at its Signature..</p><p>But pro active modules like EXpolit and Behaviour blockers will kick in after execution if any nasty work is going on under ground</p><p>Statically -YES , but no dynamically</p><p>Since modules work on behaviour interception not on Hash, or signature verification..HIPS and BB are 2 two different topics</p><p>I have seen a dozen times AV's like F secure, Avast, Bit defender, G data, Kaspersky , Eset (Modified) intercepting the attack after execution</p><p>Vendors like Comodo, and others who work on hashes scanning however lose the battle</p><p>AVIRA (Cloud) works in similar way (triggers only for unknown hash and signature)..witha naked trusted signature you can bypass it</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mahesh Sudula, post: 762925, member: 65679"] However i agree most of the vendors give it a clean sheet bindly by seeing at its Signature.. But pro active modules like EXpolit and Behaviour blockers will kick in after execution if any nasty work is going on under ground Statically -YES , but no dynamically Since modules work on behaviour interception not on Hash, or signature verification..HIPS and BB are 2 two different topics I have seen a dozen times AV's like F secure, Avast, Bit defender, G data, Kaspersky , Eset (Modified) intercepting the attack after execution Vendors like Comodo, and others who work on hashes scanning however lose the battle AVIRA (Cloud) works in similar way (triggers only for unknown hash and signature)..witha naked trusted signature you can bypass it [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
