Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ZeroDay" data-source="post: 827835" data-attributes="member: 11608"><p>I&#039;d still put a CS tweaked Comodo Firewall up against ANY paid suite. There&#039;s no denying theres issues but there&#039;s issues in every product. It&#039;s very, very rare we see a system that&#039;s protected by CF at CS&#039;s or similar settings bypassed. I honestly think CF is an amazing product. However! They do rely too heavily on the sandbox alone and if CF/CIS became as popular as some of the big names that auto sandbox would become a big target. We&#039;ve all seen CF at CS settings deal with Malware that would destroy a lot of products and it does it with ease using hardly any resources. WD+CF or KFA+CF is amazing protection in my opinion. CF on it&#039;s own tweak correctly has kept my dumb cousin safe for years. When I say dumb I mean he just doesn&#039;t listen to my advice and clicks on anything he wants to, but his system is as clean as a whistle so to speak.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="ZeroDay, post: 827835, member: 11608"] I'd still put a CS tweaked Comodo Firewall up against ANY paid suite. There's no denying theres issues but there's issues in every product. It's very, very rare we see a system that's protected by CF at CS's or similar settings bypassed. I honestly think CF is an amazing product. However! They do rely too heavily on the sandbox alone and if CF/CIS became as popular as some of the big names that auto sandbox would become a big target. We've all seen CF at CS settings deal with Malware that would destroy a lot of products and it does it with ease using hardly any resources. WD+CF or KFA+CF is amazing protection in my opinion. CF on it's own tweak correctly has kept my dumb cousin safe for years. When I say dumb I mean he just doesn't listen to my advice and clicks on anything he wants to, but his system is as clean as a whistle so to speak. [/QUOTE]

Verification