Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Comodo
Comodo Internet Security 2025 was obliterated by an exploit!
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rashmi" data-source="post: 1105911" data-attributes="member: 107361"><p>It's most likely a containment bug, so it's pointless to continue testing. Consider posting your test on Comodo forums for feedback.</p><p></p><p>I share your opinion that "Comodo is not suitable for everyone." Here's mine: "Containment serves for evaluation, not protection."</p><p></p><p>Comodo initially offered "Partially Limited" and "Limited" containment/restriction levels as protection features. The levels would restrict the rights of unknown applications on the system. Comodo's introduction of additional levels brought about changes in its functioning. They implemented "full virtualization" for running unknown applications. Containment is more of an evaluation feature now since users can't use or save their work with contained/restricted applications as they could previously. With the capability to run most applications, "Run Virtually" enables knowledgeable users to evaluate unknown apps. "Block" prevents unknown applications from running or causing harm. "Restriction Level" is nothing more than a "security display."</p><p></p><p>From my point of view, any setup that suggests "Restriction Level" for protection is merely a display of security. Why? Most users do not evaluate contained applications, so tightening the feature suggestion is unnecessary. When users encounter a containment alert or a green-bordered application, they typically close it and resume their work. "Block" is the ideal solution for these users, providing both protection and usability.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rashmi, post: 1105911, member: 107361"] It's most likely a containment bug, so it's pointless to continue testing. Consider posting your test on Comodo forums for feedback. I share your opinion that "Comodo is not suitable for everyone." Here's mine: "Containment serves for evaluation, not protection." Comodo initially offered "Partially Limited" and "Limited" containment/restriction levels as protection features. The levels would restrict the rights of unknown applications on the system. Comodo's introduction of additional levels brought about changes in its functioning. They implemented "full virtualization" for running unknown applications. Containment is more of an evaluation feature now since users can't use or save their work with contained/restricted applications as they could previously. With the capability to run most applications, "Run Virtually" enables knowledgeable users to evaluate unknown apps. "Block" prevents unknown applications from running or causing harm. "Restriction Level" is nothing more than a "security display." From my point of view, any setup that suggests "Restriction Level" for protection is merely a display of security. Why? Most users do not evaluate contained applications, so tightening the feature suggestion is unnecessary. When users encounter a containment alert or a green-bordered application, they typically close it and resume their work. "Block" is the ideal solution for these users, providing both protection and usability. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top