Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Decopi" data-source="post: 1106476" data-attributes="member: 67091">Please, allow me to disagree.Comodo is unable to detect digital threats, so Comodo is not an antivirus nor an antimalware. Comodo is only a dumb blocker, and as such, it depends on the user. That fact &quot;per se&quot;, already implies that Comodo may be useful only for a microscopic minority of users.Even so, in order to Comodo be capable to block threats, it has to become a blocker of everything, of good and bad files. That fact per se, disqualifies Comodo as a modern protection system (I repeat, because Comodo is unable to distinguish between a good file and a bad one). And worse, time passes and Comodo becomes even worse, because it accumulates hundreds of unfixed bugs, and because new digital threats appear, which force more and more to harden Comodo in a way that it will reach a point where Comodo&#039;s hardening will be based on &quot;disconnecting the device from the internet and electricity&quot;. Right now the Comodo data base is so outdated, that 80% of the safe files are blocked or Contained. In a short time, Comodo is going to block 99% of safe software (because is incapable to recognize safe files).On the other hand, by customizing Windows, either manually or through software, it is possible to achieve better or equal hardening Windows settings than Comodo.And last but not least, there are excellent antivirus/antimalwares on the market, totally free. Therefore, there is no logical explanation for using Comodo, a dumb blocker, which depends on the user, a dangerous, abandoned software, without updates/upgrades in years, and with dangerous flaws in Containment.It is immoral and irresponsible to continue promoting software like Comodo (I&#039;m not talking about you, I&#039;m talking about Comodo and its fanatics).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Decopi, post: 1106476, member: 67091"] Please, allow me to disagree. Comodo is unable to detect digital threats, so Comodo is not an antivirus nor an antimalware. Comodo is only a dumb blocker, and as such, it depends on the user. That fact "per se", already implies that Comodo may be useful only for a microscopic minority of users. Even so, in order to Comodo be capable to block threats, it has to become a blocker of everything, of good and bad files. That fact per se, disqualifies Comodo as a modern protection system (I repeat, because Comodo is unable to distinguish between a good file and a bad one). And worse, time passes and Comodo becomes even worse, because it accumulates hundreds of unfixed bugs, and because new digital threats appear, which force more and more to harden Comodo in a way that it will reach a point where Comodo's hardening will be based on "disconnecting the device from the internet and electricity". Right now the Comodo data base is so outdated, that 80% of the safe files are blocked or Contained. In a short time, Comodo is going to block 99% of safe software (because is incapable to recognize safe files). On the other hand, by customizing Windows, either manually or through software, it is possible to achieve better or equal hardening Windows settings than Comodo. And last but not least, there are excellent antivirus/antimalwares on the market, totally free. Therefore, there is no logical explanation for using Comodo, a dumb blocker, which depends on the user, a dangerous, abandoned software, without updates/upgrades in years, and with dangerous flaws in Containment. It is immoral and irresponsible to continue promoting software like Comodo (I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about Comodo and its fanatics). [/QUOTE]

Verification