Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vitali Ortzi" data-source="post: 1111138" data-attributes="member: 57714">Non profits , schools and some enterprise use their enterprise product because they claim 100% bs and are cheaper then any alternativeI really like the idea of not full virtualization that comodo does because it uses less performance then virtualization but both their container can be escaped and trusted dlls ,exes ( trusted lolbins) are automatically run without containment&nbsp; while unlike Kaspersky , other av&nbsp; software it doesn&#039;t have good behavior detection to help against a bypass as viruscope is awfulI&#039;m still using comodo on most my PCs (usually as a layer) so some bypasses might be stopped by either hitmanpro.alert or ESET on my system or checkpoint threat emulation that I have in the browser extension&nbsp; so I&#039;m safe against 99.99%+ and&nbsp; I usually submit suspicious files to Broadcom before running them using <a href="https://symsubmit.symantec.com/" target="_blank">Sample Submission | SymSubmission</a>But hopefully one day I could use only comodo comfortably if they do improve it as comodo has excellent performance usage and I have one low end 2gb ram with emmc laptop that can&#039;t run ESET on it without performance issues nor defender and comodo didn&#039;t seem to slow io , use much ram and it&#039;s a gift to low end machines making them mostly secure while not having to go chrome os route or any too restrictive policy configSo I definitely find comodo very useful and because it&#039;s not perfect if anyone uses comodo use it as a layer if possible with some free av (Kaspersky free, defender&nbsp; , bitdefender free&nbsp; ,avast free etc&nbsp; )</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vitali Ortzi, post: 1111138, member: 57714"] Non profits , schools and some enterprise use their enterprise product because they claim 100% bs and are cheaper then any alternative I really like the idea of not full virtualization that comodo does because it uses less performance then virtualization but both their container can be escaped and trusted dlls ,exes ( trusted lolbins) are automatically run without containment while unlike Kaspersky , other av software it doesn't have good behavior detection to help against a bypass as viruscope is awful I'm still using comodo on most my PCs (usually as a layer) so some bypasses might be stopped by either hitmanpro.alert or ESET on my system or checkpoint threat emulation that I have in the browser extension so I'm safe against 99.99%+ and I usually submit suspicious files to Broadcom before running them using [URL='https://symsubmit.symantec.com/']Sample Submission | SymSubmission[/URL] But hopefully one day I could use only comodo comfortably if they do improve it as comodo has excellent performance usage and I have one low end 2gb ram with emmc laptop that can't run ESET on it without performance issues nor defender and comodo didn't seem to slow io , use much ram and it's a gift to low end machines making them mostly secure while not having to go chrome os route or any too restrictive policy config So I definitely find comodo very useful and because it's not perfect if anyone uses comodo use it as a layer if possible with some free av (Kaspersky free, defender , bitdefender free ,avast free etc ) [/QUOTE]

Verification