App Review Comodo Internet Security 8 2 review

It is advised to take all reviews with a grain of salt. In extreme cases some reviews use dramatization for entertainment purposes.
I think flashp.exe was running in sandbox.
ResetSandbox would have deleted it.

You tried ResetSandbox after running it from VTRoot folder.
And running it from VT folder, it was not sandboxed.
I think thats why ResetSandbox didn't deleted it.

Files running from VT folder were not sandboxed.
Dont know if its by design or a bug?
I think its a dangerous bug.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Logethica, Koroke San, Moose and 1 other person
Davidov said:
This bug has been fixed in the latest version.Nice day.
Click to expand...
VT folder one i.e running malware from VT folder are sandboxed now in the latest version?

I have asked this in Comodo forum too.

May be Cruelsister will shed some light.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Logethica
I read it in the last update (log what's new) When updating Comodo.Repair VTroot running outside the sandbox.
 

  • I think that's it Friend


    • What’s new
    • New file group "File Archivers"
      • − Accessible in ASE -> File Rating -> File Groups
    • Updated Auto-Sandbox rule to sandbox
      • − "Run Virtual" files extracted from archives downloaded from Internet
      Fixed
    • Several critical bugs fixes. Here are a selected few:
      • − New Dragon 36.1.1.21 crashes if CIS installed
      • − Accidental crash of cmdAgent service
      • − Trusted executable file can be replaced with Unknown executable file
      • − VT_ROOT is not deleted during Sandbox Reset after launch some malware
 
There is no fix mentioning "malware run from VT folder were not sandboxed".

And if I remember correctly in this test video, malware files were run from VT Temp folder & were not sandboxed so dont know its a bug too?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Logethica

You may also like...