Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Hard_Configurator Tools
ConfigureDefender utility for Windows 10/11
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SeriousHoax" data-source="post: 835097" data-attributes="member: 78686"><p>For points 1 & 3 WD has a pretty huge advantage over other AVs I think. Almost all AVs has some sort of cloud servers where with the help of AI and sandbox they analyze malwares and protect users against new threats via their cloud protection before creating signatures. For example, Kaspersky's KSN, ESET's Live Grid, etc has similar purpose. WD has this too. Microsoft being the owner of Azure cloud service and WD, they can afford to invest a lot of their cloud infrastructure to WD. So, Microsoft's Azure Cloud AI server network is a lot larger than other AVs server. As a result, they can process a lot more threats every minutes than their competitors. This clearly shows in many of the recent AV labs results. WD is still weak at signature based detection, they are late at creating signatures but their investment in the cloud is being paid of.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SeriousHoax, post: 835097, member: 78686"] For points 1 & 3 WD has a pretty huge advantage over other AVs I think. Almost all AVs has some sort of cloud servers where with the help of AI and sandbox they analyze malwares and protect users against new threats via their cloud protection before creating signatures. For example, Kaspersky's KSN, ESET's Live Grid, etc has similar purpose. WD has this too. Microsoft being the owner of Azure cloud service and WD, they can afford to invest a lot of their cloud infrastructure to WD. So, Microsoft's Azure Cloud AI server network is a lot larger than other AVs server. As a result, they can process a lot more threats every minutes than their competitors. This clearly shows in many of the recent AV labs results. WD is still weak at signature based detection, they are late at creating signatures but their investment in the cloud is being paid of. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
