Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="MacDefender" data-source="post: 844910" data-attributes="member: 83059"><p>They've been crazy crazy good at this especially since v13. Most of the zero days I analyze are dynamically generated Mac malware and I've found dozens in the last week where VT detection rates are 2 or 3 out of 69 and ESET is always amongst the 2 that detect it, and it detects whatever you feed at it. They somehow manage to detect zero-day variations of existing malware using generic signatures but they don't suffer from frequent false positives which is usually what happens with other vendors' AI-based engines (like Symantec's AdvML.x signatures, which seem to nab corporate Powershell scripts once a month or two if you crawl back on their forums)</p></blockquote><p></p>

Top