Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Consumer Malware Protection Test September 2020
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EndangeredPootis" data-source="post: 909337" data-attributes="member: 82260"><p>What's the chance 4 will all have 99.96%, 3 with 99.98%, 3 with 99.9% detection ratio at the same time? exactly, it makes no sense, and I still don't understand why people still trust in these test sites, especially considering the fact they never show them taking place, it is like believing in a president or king, just because many people support7trust them doesn't mean you can trust everything they say.</p><p></p><p>Also, they gave WD 2 stars despite it having supposedley 100% detection ratio, for what? it had an higher than average false positive rate? how does that make sense, it can easily mislead people.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EndangeredPootis, post: 909337, member: 82260"] What's the chance 4 will all have 99.96%, 3 with 99.98%, 3 with 99.9% detection ratio at the same time? exactly, it makes no sense, and I still don't understand why people still trust in these test sites, especially considering the fact they never show them taking place, it is like believing in a president or king, just because many people support7trust them doesn't mean you can trust everything they say. Also, they gave WD 2 stars despite it having supposedley 100% detection ratio, for what? it had an higher than average false positive rate? how does that make sense, it can easily mislead people. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
