Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 909363" data-attributes="member: 32260">It is worth to look at the Cluster column in the scoring table:[ATTACH=full]247397[/ATTACH]It seems that cluster analysis includes the natural randomness of results that follows from the testing procedure. The test cannot prove any difference in the real protection of the first 11 AVs (they belong to the same cluster).<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" />The cluster analysis gives similar results as the statistical model described in the thread &quot;Randomness in the AV Labs testing&quot;, for example:[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://malwaretips.com/threads/randomness-in-the-av-labs-testing.104104/post-905937[/URL]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 909363, member: 32260"] It is worth to look at the Cluster column in the scoring table: [ATTACH type="full" alt="1602801484714.png"]247397[/ATTACH] It seems that cluster analysis includes the natural randomness of results that follows from the testing procedure. The test cannot prove any difference in the real protection of the first 11 AVs (they belong to the same cluster).(y) The cluster analysis gives similar results as the statistical model described in the thread "[SIZE=4]Randomness in the AV Labs testing[/SIZE][B][SIZE=4]", [/SIZE][/B][SIZE=4]for example: [URL unfurl="true"]https://malwaretips.com/threads/randomness-in-the-av-labs-testing.104104/post-905937[/URL][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]

Verification