Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Consumer Malware Protection Test September 2020
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 909426" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p><strong>AV-Comparatives Malware Protection tests 2019-2020.</strong></p><p></p><p>Cumulative results for last 2 years (March 2019, September 2019, March 2020, September 2020):</p><p></p><p><strong>----------------<span style="color: rgb(41, 105, 176)">Missed samples</span></strong>----<span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong>Clusters</strong></span></p><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(0, 168, 133)">Group 1</span></strong></p><p>Avast, AVG........1+0+2+0.............1,1,1,1</p><p>Norton...............(2)+(2)+0+2.......1,1,1,1</p><p>Bitdefender.......1+5+2+1.............1,1,1,1</p><p>K7......................5+5+1+2.............1,1,1,1</p><p>Avira* ................0+4+3+4............1,1,1,2</p><p></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 168, 133)"><strong>Group 2</strong></span></p><p>Panda ................1+1+4+11.........1,1,1,3</p><p>Microsoft...........2+4+12+0..........1,1,3,1</p><p>VIPRE ................4+10+3+4 .........1,2,1,2</p><p>F-Secure ...........14+9+0+1.......... 2,2,1,1</p><p>Kaspersky......... 13+9+3+1..........2,2,1,1</p><p>ESET...................15+12+1+2 .......2,2,1,1</p><p>Total Defense*...5+19+1+4.........1,3,1,2</p><p></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 168, 133)"><strong>Group 3</strong></span></p><p>McAfee ............11+19+7+0.........2,3,2,1</p><p></p><p><strong>Hard to classify</strong></p><p>Trend Micro......0+0+82+175...... 1,1,4,4</p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">The last column shows cluster analysis, which is most important</span>.</strong> The number of missed samples is less important, but I have taken it as the secondary classification parameter (Avira, TotalDefense).</p><p>These tests cannot prove what is real protection of AVs in the same group (cluster analysis) - they can have the same protection in the wild despite a different number of missed samples.</p><p>Furthermore, the average detection difference between Group 1 and 2 is very little ( about 17 missed samples per 42000 total samples).</p><p>So, in practice, it would be hard to see the protection difference between most of the tested AVs (which is already a well known fact).<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/malware-protection-test-march-2019/[/URL]</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/malware-protection-test-september-2019/[/URL]</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/malware-protection-test-march-2020/[/URL]</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/malware-protection-test-september-2020/[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 909426, member: 32260"] [B]AV-Comparatives Malware Protection tests 2019-2020.[/B] Cumulative results for last 2 years (March 2019, September 2019, March 2020, September 2020): [B]----------------[COLOR=rgb(41, 105, 176)]Missed samples[/COLOR][/B]----[COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B]Clusters[/B][/COLOR] [B][COLOR=rgb(0, 168, 133)]Group 1[/COLOR][/B] Avast, AVG........1+0+2+0.............1,1,1,1 Norton...............(2)+(2)+0+2.......1,1,1,1 Bitdefender.......1+5+2+1.............1,1,1,1 K7......................5+5+1+2.............1,1,1,1 Avira* ................0+4+3+4............1,1,1,2 [COLOR=rgb(0, 168, 133)][B]Group 2[/B][/COLOR] Panda ................1+1+4+11.........1,1,1,3 Microsoft...........2+4+12+0..........1,1,3,1 VIPRE ................4+10+3+4 .........1,2,1,2 F-Secure ...........14+9+0+1.......... 2,2,1,1 Kaspersky......... 13+9+3+1..........2,2,1,1 ESET...................15+12+1+2 .......2,2,1,1 Total Defense*...5+19+1+4.........1,3,1,2 [COLOR=rgb(0, 168, 133)][B]Group 3[/B][/COLOR] McAfee ............11+19+7+0.........2,3,2,1 [B]Hard to classify[/B] Trend Micro......0+0+82+175...... 1,1,4,4 [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]The last column shows cluster analysis, which is most important[/COLOR].[/B] The number of missed samples is less important, but I have taken it as the secondary classification parameter (Avira, TotalDefense). These tests cannot prove what is real protection of AVs in the same group (cluster analysis) - they can have the same protection in the wild despite a different number of missed samples. Furthermore, the average detection difference between Group 1 and 2 is very little ( about 17 missed samples per 42000 total samples). So, in practice, it would be hard to see the protection difference between most of the tested AVs (which is already a well known fact).:)(y) [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/malware-protection-test-march-2019/[/URL] [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/malware-protection-test-september-2019/[/URL] [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/malware-protection-test-march-2020/[/URL] [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/malware-protection-test-september-2020/[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top