Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Cyber Transparency Audit Q2 2024 - "Transparency First. Then Trust"
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Adrian Ścibor" data-source="post: 1104397" data-attributes="member: 71496"><p>Interesting opinion. </p><p></p><p>To dig deeper, note that the methodology may contain interesting points:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I mean, hardened policy protection... </p><p></p><p>It is certain that the default policy is usually not very good. Especially in medium and Enterprise environments. I myself wonder what the difference would be between these settings from the worldwide statistics for producers XYZ. </p><p></p><p>Even if, in a hardened policy, this rate was 1-3% this would indicate that minimising the effects of attacks makes sense and that the marketing assurances of producers can be thrown into the hole. Can anyone, therefore, offer guarantees... On the other hand - most of us know that product XYZ does not deliver what its producer says it does, and yet we accept being pressured into doing what the producers want us to say.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Adrian Ścibor, post: 1104397, member: 71496"] Interesting opinion. To dig deeper, note that the methodology may contain interesting points: I mean, hardened policy protection... It is certain that the default policy is usually not very good. Especially in medium and Enterprise environments. I myself wonder what the difference would be between these settings from the worldwide statistics for producers XYZ. Even if, in a hardened policy, this rate was 1-3% this would indicate that minimising the effects of attacks makes sense and that the marketing assurances of producers can be thrown into the hole. Can anyone, therefore, offer guarantees... On the other hand - most of us know that product XYZ does not deliver what its producer says it does, and yet we accept being pressured into doing what the producers want us to say. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
