Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
Cylance - Targeted and Bypassed
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Burrito" data-source="post: 825358" data-attributes="member: 72439"><p>Yeah, to address the bypass in the article, you are right -- I believe.</p><p></p><p>But..... The article puts forth the implication that there could be many... hundreds or thousands of applications where malicious code could be appended to whitelisted code.</p><p></p><p>So I think the larger question is.... how does Cylance fix the algorithm that apparently universally could allow malicious coded appended to whitelisted code to subvert the malware scoring model.</p><p></p><p>Cylance seems to have taken a shortcut to avoid false positives which opened up a vector for malware attack. </p><p></p><p>I can't say this is at all surprising to me. With more research, other vectors of attack can be found... and that won't change. It just makes Cylance and other ML/AI products more like 'earlier gen' products than their marketing would like you to believe.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Burrito, post: 825358, member: 72439"] Yeah, to address the bypass in the article, you are right -- I believe. But..... The article puts forth the implication that there could be many... hundreds or thousands of applications where malicious code could be appended to whitelisted code. So I think the larger question is.... how does Cylance fix the algorithm that apparently universally could allow malicious coded appended to whitelisted code to subvert the malware scoring model. Cylance seems to have taken a shortcut to avoid false positives which opened up a vector for malware attack. I can't say this is at all surprising to me. With more research, other vectors of attack can be found... and that won't change. It just makes Cylance and other ML/AI products more like 'earlier gen' products than their marketing would like you to believe. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top