Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
Cylance Updated Online Interface
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Burrito" data-source="post: 867973" data-attributes="member: 72439"><p>I think it is really good.... for what it is. There are a few holes... like exploits and preventative web protection. But Cylance is surprisingly effective for having such a tiny footprint and virtually no system impact. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Since Cylance has no scanning function and is highly specialized but possibly has a few areas of 'lesser coverage' -- I would think that periodic scanning might be prudent.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hmmmm.... I'm not sure. My assumption is that the ML/AI piece is done locally.</p><p></p><p>When I first become interested in Cylance, my interest was partially based on this test of the Cylance 'Predictive Advantage.' This SE Labs test seems to indicate that the ML/AI piece is done at the endpoint.</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://selabs.uk/download/enterprise/march-2018-pmr.pdf[/URL]</p><p></p><p>But Cylance does ask permission to move tagged files to the cloud.</p><p></p><p>And... there was other information 'out there' that seemed to indicate that maybe a cloud could be more involved. If I remember correctly, this was Umbra's belief. But I dunno.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]235304[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Burrito, post: 867973, member: 72439"] I think it is really good.... for what it is. There are a few holes... like exploits and preventative web protection. But Cylance is surprisingly effective for having such a tiny footprint and virtually no system impact. Since Cylance has no scanning function and is highly specialized but possibly has a few areas of 'lesser coverage' -- I would think that periodic scanning might be prudent. Hmmmm.... I'm not sure. My assumption is that the ML/AI piece is done locally. When I first become interested in Cylance, my interest was partially based on this test of the Cylance 'Predictive Advantage.' This SE Labs test seems to indicate that the ML/AI piece is done at the endpoint. [URL unfurl="true"]https://selabs.uk/download/enterprise/march-2018-pmr.pdf[/URL] But Cylance does ask permission to move tagged files to the cloud. And... there was other information 'out there' that seemed to indicate that maybe a cloud could be more involved. If I remember correctly, this was Umbra's belief. But I dunno. [ATTACH type="full" alt="1585054960041.png"]235304[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top