Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Default Deny VS traditional AVs
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 758637" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>All three solutions can be good if the user knows the <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong>weak points</strong></span> of adopted security and does not expose <strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">them</span></strong> via vulnerable activities.</p><p>For example, the user on the well updated Windows 10 can be very secure with AV, if he:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">uses apps in App Container for vulnerable activities (web browsing, viewing/editing documents, etc.);</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">installs only applications accepted by SmartScreen (EXE, MSI installers) downloaded via the web browser to the NTFS hard disk;</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">does not open files with vulnerable/unknown extensions;</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">avoids spam and think twice before opening e-mail attachments;</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">uses safe DNS service;</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">uses 'Public network' profile;</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">uses the separate account for shopping.</li> </ul><p>The above is not a rocket science, so most MalwareTips readers can learn/adopt it quickly.</p><p>Personally, I would like to vote for AV with fast signatures + smart default-deny. The word 'smart' means that executing the new files is disabled by default except for some whitelisted locations and application installers which are forced to be always checked by the good application reputation service (like SmartScreen).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 758637, member: 32260"] All three solutions can be good if the user knows the [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B]weak points[/B][/COLOR] of adopted security and does not expose [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]them[/COLOR][/B] via vulnerable activities. For example, the user on the well updated Windows 10 can be very secure with AV, if he: [LIST] [*]uses apps in App Container for vulnerable activities (web browsing, viewing/editing documents, etc.); [*]installs only applications accepted by SmartScreen (EXE, MSI installers) downloaded via the web browser to the NTFS hard disk; [*]does not open files with vulnerable/unknown extensions; [*]avoids spam and think twice before opening e-mail attachments; [*]uses safe DNS service; [*]uses 'Public network' profile; [*]uses the separate account for shopping. [/LIST] The above is not a rocket science, so most MalwareTips readers can learn/adopt it quickly. Personally, I would like to vote for AV with fast signatures + smart default-deny. The word 'smart' means that executing the new files is disabled by default except for some whitelisted locations and application installers which are forced to be always checked by the good application reputation service (like SmartScreen). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top