Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Default Deny VS traditional AVs
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Evjl&#039;s Rain" data-source="post: 758686" data-attributes="member: 51905"><p>I'm using both: a zero-weight simple AV for signatures (no BB, no webfilter) and comodo firewall for missed stuffs</p><p>zero-weight AV means the AV which you can't really notice its existence on your PC compare to itself without the AV (and it must be free!!! or it's a waste of money)</p><p></p><p>Default-deny blocks everything without a clear indicator of a file being safe or unsafe. We need to spare some time to determine its safety by analyzing tools, which I don't have time for</p><p>With a zero-weight AV, it blocks most of the malwares => less work for comodo = less time to analyze malwares</p><p></p><p>it is different in every user. 1 encounters malwares frequently/every month, the other get 1 or very few per year</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Evjl's Rain, post: 758686, member: 51905"] I'm using both: a zero-weight simple AV for signatures (no BB, no webfilter) and comodo firewall for missed stuffs zero-weight AV means the AV which you can't really notice its existence on your PC compare to itself without the AV (and it must be free!!! or it's a waste of money) Default-deny blocks everything without a clear indicator of a file being safe or unsafe. We need to spare some time to determine its safety by analyzing tools, which I don't have time for With a zero-weight AV, it blocks most of the malwares => less work for comodo = less time to analyze malwares it is different in every user. 1 encounters malwares frequently/every month, the other get 1 or very few per year [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
