Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Default Deny VS traditional AVs
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Evjl&#039;s Rain" data-source="post: 758693" data-attributes="member: 51905"><p>it depends on what you like</p><p>for me, my zero-weight AVs which I have been pairing with CF for months are Zemana antimalware/antilogger (if you can grab a free license) and immunet (disable the useless clamAV, only use cloud engines)</p><p></p><p>zemana refused to acknowledge my bug report of extreme memory usage after several hours of usage so I put it in second place</p><p>immunet has far better signatures than zemana</p><p></p><p>they are disastrous to use alone but when we pair with CF, they perform well</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Evjl's Rain, post: 758693, member: 51905"] it depends on what you like for me, my zero-weight AVs which I have been pairing with CF for months are Zemana antimalware/antilogger (if you can grab a free license) and immunet (disable the useless clamAV, only use cloud engines) zemana refused to acknowledge my bug report of extreme memory usage after several hours of usage so I put it in second place immunet has far better signatures than zemana they are disastrous to use alone but when we pair with CF, they perform well [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top