Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Default Deny VS traditional AVs
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Evjl&#039;s Rain" data-source="post: 758756" data-attributes="member: 51905"><p>yes, extremely solid, close to impenetrable but I truly believe TAM and the changes I showed above are identical because I tried to monitor what TAM did and it simply put every single file which were unknown to KSN to untrusted = block/not executable. I don't know how they are different from each other</p><p>I noticed some performance drop with TAM but maybe not with the replicated settings</p><p></p><p>I think with the above settings, TAM can be safely disabled, for better system performance</p><p></p><p>according to kaspersky</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Evjl's Rain, post: 758756, member: 51905"] yes, extremely solid, close to impenetrable but I truly believe TAM and the changes I showed above are identical because I tried to monitor what TAM did and it simply put every single file which were unknown to KSN to untrusted = block/not executable. I don't know how they are different from each other I noticed some performance drop with TAM but maybe not with the replicated settings I think with the above settings, TAM can be safely disabled, for better system performance according to kaspersky [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
