Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Defender vs a Novel Stealer Variant
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andrezj" data-source="post: 1014552" data-attributes="member: 97580"><p>what a person does is far more important to their safety than what softwares they combine and use, but a place like this is hyper focused on security software and the localhost</p><p>for the neophyte that downloads whatever they want microsoft defender can end up not being enough, for the advanced security minded user microsoft defender probably is enough because even if they get infected they will know how to handle it</p><p>since there are no infection statistics per specific security software (there is, but it is highly guarded internal software publisher statistics) that anyone can reference, the discussion is highly flawed and problematic, but pointing users to use a better bandaid is better than nothing</p><p>it should make you wonder why publishers do not openly share their infection rate statistics (even sanitized details that cannot be leveraged by bad actors)</p><p>however, senior microsoft personnel stated that their s mode was highly secure giving them the best security results they ever had, since this is based upon actual deployment at scale (across millions of devices), you can intelligently infer what digital security philosophy, strategy and methods are not perfect, but highly effective</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andrezj, post: 1014552, member: 97580"] what a person does is far more important to their safety than what softwares they combine and use, but a place like this is hyper focused on security software and the localhost for the neophyte that downloads whatever they want microsoft defender can end up not being enough, for the advanced security minded user microsoft defender probably is enough because even if they get infected they will know how to handle it since there are no infection statistics per specific security software (there is, but it is highly guarded internal software publisher statistics) that anyone can reference, the discussion is highly flawed and problematic, but pointing users to use a better bandaid is better than nothing it should make you wonder why publishers do not openly share their infection rate statistics (even sanitized details that cannot be leveraged by bad actors) however, senior microsoft personnel stated that their s mode was highly secure giving them the best security results they ever had, since this is based upon actual deployment at scale (across millions of devices), you can intelligently infer what digital security philosophy, strategy and methods are not perfect, but highly effective [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top