Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 1096341" data-attributes="member: 32260">Thanks for posting this article.&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" />For most readers, this fragment can be important:In my opinion, SAC is a practical solution intended to support the AV and cannot be considered a panacea.Until standard attack vectors (well-blocked by SAC) are very effective in the wild, SAC can be a powerful protection layer. Sooner or later this happy picture will change and Windows built-in security must evolve to be still powerful.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 1096341, member: 32260"] Thanks for posting this article. :)(y) For most readers, this fragment can be important: In my opinion, SAC is a practical solution intended to support the AV and cannot be considered a panacea. Until standard attack vectors (well-blocked by SAC) are very effective in the wild, SAC can be a powerful protection layer. Sooner or later this happy picture will change and Windows built-in security must evolve to be still powerful. [/QUOTE]

Verification