Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Do Antiviruses Still Slow You Down? (2020) (LTT)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 72227" data-source="post: 886458"><p>Back from a little hiatus!<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>IMO any program that takes up system resources will have an impact on the system. The real question however, is whether said impact is noticeable? The problem with Windows is the infinite number of hardware/software combinations available, which makes it difficult to get an accurate assessment. Looking at the responses here and in other threads, you will notice that all security programs will have varied results when it comes to performance. Some say they find Kaspersky light, others says it's heavy, same goes for Norton, WD, BD, etc.... Even tests from the likes of AV-Comparatives aren't overly accurate either. Again its just a quick snapshot in time and doesn't take into account what the overall impact will be long term. </p><p></p><p>All in all I think they best solution for anyone is to try the program(s) and see for yourself. After all it doesn't matter what any of us, or AV-comparatvies, etc... say, all that matters is whether YOU notice the impact. As I said above, everyone will have different hardware/software configurations and everyone uses their computers differently, so take advantage of the trials and go from there, it really is the only way to know for sure.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite140" alt=":emoji_beer:" title="Beer :emoji_beer:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":emoji_beer:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 72227, post: 886458"] Back from a little hiatus!:) IMO any program that takes up system resources will have an impact on the system. The real question however, is whether said impact is noticeable? The problem with Windows is the infinite number of hardware/software combinations available, which makes it difficult to get an accurate assessment. Looking at the responses here and in other threads, you will notice that all security programs will have varied results when it comes to performance. Some say they find Kaspersky light, others says it's heavy, same goes for Norton, WD, BD, etc.... Even tests from the likes of AV-Comparatives aren't overly accurate either. Again its just a quick snapshot in time and doesn't take into account what the overall impact will be long term. All in all I think they best solution for anyone is to try the program(s) and see for yourself. After all it doesn't matter what any of us, or AV-comparatvies, etc... say, all that matters is whether YOU notice the impact. As I said above, everyone will have different hardware/software configurations and everyone uses their computers differently, so take advantage of the trials and go from there, it really is the only way to know for sure.(y):emoji_beer: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top