Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Do we have official - of any date - proof that BitLocker has a backdoor?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Studynxx" data-source="post: 1097758" data-attributes="member: 98674"><p>A backdoor for when Law Enforcement Agencies want to access your drives, shares, whatever? Sure it helps protect against the average person, but StackingSmashing could hack BL in 43 seconds.</p><p></p><p>I ask because I'm curious if, for example, an operator of, say, LockBit got raided and his laptop had BL on all the drives, AND the operator refused to give up the PIN even under torture, would they still eventually get access to it?</p><p></p><p>I know the question is worded strangely but essentially, do we official proof that LEA's have backdoor access to BitLocker? I know legit companies use BitLocker on a policy level thru MBAM or INTUNE, it's part of a pre-requirement for their cyber insurance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Studynxx, post: 1097758, member: 98674"] A backdoor for when Law Enforcement Agencies want to access your drives, shares, whatever? Sure it helps protect against the average person, but StackingSmashing could hack BL in 43 seconds. I ask because I'm curious if, for example, an operator of, say, LockBit got raided and his laptop had BL on all the drives, AND the operator refused to give up the PIN even under torture, would they still eventually get access to it? I know the question is worded strangely but essentially, do we official proof that LEA's have backdoor access to BitLocker? I know legit companies use BitLocker on a policy level thru MBAM or INTUNE, it's part of a pre-requirement for their cyber insurance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
