Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Do you consider this a block or a fail?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 807789" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>I think that all our posts <strong>do not apply to your tests</strong>, because [USER=50782]@Windows_Security[/USER] has not mentioned in his post if "Run As SmartScreen" was used in the test to run executables. I assumed (and probably other MT members), that standard "Run as administrator" was used in the test to run executables. If so, then the test procedure could be questionable.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></p><p></p><p>Edit.</p><p>If I correctly remember, [USER=50782]@Windows_Security[/USER] uses SRP + allowing elevation of signed executables only, and does not use "Run As SmartScreen".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 807789, member: 32260"] I think that all our posts [B]do not apply to your tests[/B], because [USER=50782]@Windows_Security[/USER] has not mentioned in his post if "Run As SmartScreen" was used in the test to run executables. I assumed (and probably other MT members), that standard "Run as administrator" was used in the test to run executables. If so, then the test procedure could be questionable.(y) Edit. If I correctly remember, [USER=50782]@Windows_Security[/USER] uses SRP + allowing elevation of signed executables only, and does not use "Run As SmartScreen". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
