Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Do You Prefer Antivirus Software Lighter on CPU, Memory or Disk?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Captain Holly" data-source="post: 1096677" data-attributes="member: 90494"><p>I prefer an AV that is lighter on CPU. My daily driver laptop has 16GB of RAM and a 1TB SSD so I have plenty of memory and there is hardly anything on my SSD so that's not an issue either. I just don't like it when one AV/program or another slows my computer down. At the same time I don't want to sacrifice security either so I have tried to find the happy medium. I stopped using Linux about 6 weeks ago. Not sure if I will ever go back to Linux either. I am on Windows 11 23H2 again now and started out with WD by itself on all default settings. Then I added my old lifetime MBAM Premium license with the MB Browser Guard extension in Edge and Firefox. FF ran OK like that but Edge slowed down really bad. As a process of elimination to solve the problem I first removed the browser guard. That helped a little but my laptop really snapped back to normal after I removed the entire MBAM app. I am using the free Avast One Basic now. Avast uses less than half the RAM that MBAM did, the laptop is really quick no matter which browser I use and CPU usage is way down too. I don't use FF enough for it to make much difference but I do still use MB Browser Guard in FF. I think I have a very good balance between speed and security now. I probably would have been ok with just WD but I wanted something stronger than WD by itself.</p><p></p><p>C.H.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Captain Holly, post: 1096677, member: 90494"] I prefer an AV that is lighter on CPU. My daily driver laptop has 16GB of RAM and a 1TB SSD so I have plenty of memory and there is hardly anything on my SSD so that's not an issue either. I just don't like it when one AV/program or another slows my computer down. At the same time I don't want to sacrifice security either so I have tried to find the happy medium. I stopped using Linux about 6 weeks ago. Not sure if I will ever go back to Linux either. I am on Windows 11 23H2 again now and started out with WD by itself on all default settings. Then I added my old lifetime MBAM Premium license with the MB Browser Guard extension in Edge and Firefox. FF ran OK like that but Edge slowed down really bad. As a process of elimination to solve the problem I first removed the browser guard. That helped a little but my laptop really snapped back to normal after I removed the entire MBAM app. I am using the free Avast One Basic now. Avast uses less than half the RAM that MBAM did, the laptop is really quick no matter which browser I use and CPU usage is way down too. I don't use FF enough for it to make much difference but I do still use MB Browser Guard in FF. I think I have a very good balance between speed and security now. I probably would have been ok with just WD but I wanted something stronger than WD by itself. C.H. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top