Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Does Windows Defender Antivirus cause Slowdown?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Penguin" data-source="post: 812717" data-attributes="member: 79476"><p>Thank you for your explanation. Given the case my favorite program is compromised on it's legit installer, I doubt anything, signature or signatureless will catch it. Maybe an HIPS would block certain actions that infected installer wants to do, but highlight it as malware? Please confirm, I really don't know.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Thank you too for the explanation and for taking the time of sharing the definition for this module. I know it's not an antivirus, I just meant that the given module + automatic sandbox would leave very few covered areas for signatures. Of course there are others areas CFW wouldn't protect. Anyways, if such case occurs and somebody needs signatures, he either installs a lot of programs (for which CFW wouldn't be suitable) or just got unlucky and got hit by some malware like CCleaner case, for which no signature could have helped.</p><p></p><p>Stated this, I still must say I'm not against signatures, I just wouldn't use them paired with CFW if configured with automatic sandbox. I do used them at Defender with VS and WFC.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Thank you for sharing these advice!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Penguin, post: 812717, member: 79476"] Thank you for your explanation. Given the case my favorite program is compromised on it's legit installer, I doubt anything, signature or signatureless will catch it. Maybe an HIPS would block certain actions that infected installer wants to do, but highlight it as malware? Please confirm, I really don't know. Thank you too for the explanation and for taking the time of sharing the definition for this module. I know it's not an antivirus, I just meant that the given module + automatic sandbox would leave very few covered areas for signatures. Of course there are others areas CFW wouldn't protect. Anyways, if such case occurs and somebody needs signatures, he either installs a lot of programs (for which CFW wouldn't be suitable) or just got unlucky and got hit by some malware like CCleaner case, for which no signature could have helped. Stated this, I still must say I'm not against signatures, I just wouldn't use them paired with CFW if configured with automatic sandbox. I do used them at Defender with VS and WFC. Thank you for sharing these advice! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top