It appears that many reputable AV's are not quite what they used to be.
It all depends on your perception of what you think a AV should do.
If you expect your AV to block more than 80% of the malware that you are exposed to, then it is a disappointment.
If you understand that most AV's will not be able to block more than 80% of the malware that you are exposed to and your AV is just there to help you while you try your best to safely browse the web and download files, avoid malware contact by your own actions and utilize Windows default security features, then you will not get disappointed.
Too many users want to set back like they don't have to do anything for security but depend on their AV to do all the work.
In return no matter which AV they use, they still will get infections.
AV's can only protect users that are careful, pay attention and want to learn.
In about the last 5 years or so, the only time that I got a notice from my AV that a threat was blocked is when it detected a false alert.
Malware can easily be avoided today if a user wants to learn unlike in the past when malware could automatically infect your system just by visiting a bad website using active X controls in old IE. Most malware today is distributed by fake alert sites that fool users into manually downloading and running the infected files. Other malware uses vulnerabilities in out-dated software or unpatched Windows OS and a small percentage transfers using insecure USB devices (of coarse still requires the user to manually run the infected files) since Autorun is disabled for USB devices on modern Windows OS. Browser add-ons are automatically disabled by default on most modern browsers, modern Windows OS has much better security features than before. With all of these nice security features users continue to not be able to control their clicking.
Thanks.
