Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Emsisoft Anti-Malware 12 Behavior Blocker Test (without cloud assistance)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AtlBo" data-source="post: 582027" data-attributes="member: 32547"><p>Great test thanks.</p><p></p><p>Is there any chance that any of top security companies could have failsafes built in to their product so that the sigs or heuristics kick in at a certain point with some behaviors? By this I mean a built in override of the settings (in this case HIPS only). I am considering this possibility with other elements of a security program too.</p><p></p><p>This would kind of make sense to me that a company might do this, because they aren't thinking of testing and it's their names on the product. I think it's a curiosity to consider this kind of thing, but when I view the tests I try to keep in mind the developers big picture viewpoint. Kind of can't get around being curious about how they think with settings choices, the customer, and the product.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AtlBo, post: 582027, member: 32547"] Great test thanks. Is there any chance that any of top security companies could have failsafes built in to their product so that the sigs or heuristics kick in at a certain point with some behaviors? By this I mean a built in override of the settings (in this case HIPS only). I am considering this possibility with other elements of a security program too. This would kind of make sense to me that a company might do this, because they aren't thinking of testing and it's their names on the product. I think it's a curiosity to consider this kind of thing, but when I view the tests I try to keep in mind the developers big picture viewpoint. Kind of can't get around being curious about how they think with settings choices, the customer, and the product. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top