Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Emsisoft Anti-Malware 12 Behavior Blocker Test (without cloud assistance)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RejZoR" data-source="post: 582064" data-attributes="member: 57233"><p>Well, certainly. But when behavior blocker alone can pick up nearly 99,99% of everything you throw at it, that means pretty much anything not covered by traditional signatures will with great certainty be detected by behavior blocker. If behavior blocker only detects like 5% or 10% of samples on its own, I wouldn't exactly rely on it catching what signatures miss, unless the missed stuff is exactly those 5-10% of what behavior blocker does detect. But we all know math doesn't work that way when we're dealing with malware.</p><p></p><p>Which is why I'm testing behavior blockers as stand alone components. To give users general idea how much they can rely on behavior blockers doing the job when you take signatures out of the equation (basically emulating a signature miss scenario).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RejZoR, post: 582064, member: 57233"] Well, certainly. But when behavior blocker alone can pick up nearly 99,99% of everything you throw at it, that means pretty much anything not covered by traditional signatures will with great certainty be detected by behavior blocker. If behavior blocker only detects like 5% or 10% of samples on its own, I wouldn't exactly rely on it catching what signatures miss, unless the missed stuff is exactly those 5-10% of what behavior blocker does detect. But we all know math doesn't work that way when we're dealing with malware. Which is why I'm testing behavior blockers as stand alone components. To give users general idea how much they can rely on behavior blockers doing the job when you take signatures out of the equation (basically emulating a signature miss scenario). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top