I tested the detection rate of the beta version of EAM. Its detection rate was 36.4%. :(
ptup Level 3 Thread author Jul 31, 2012 102 Sep 6, 2012 #1 I tested the detection rate of the beta version of EAM. Its detection rate was 36.4%. Last edited by a moderator: Dec 10, 2013
I Ink Administrator Verified Jan 8, 2011 22,490 Sep 6, 2012 #2 What samples did you use? Did you download BD signatures too, I recall something about using only Emsisoft sigs aren't that great.
What samples did you use? Did you download BD signatures too, I recall something about using only Emsisoft sigs aren't that great.
ptup Level 3 Thread author Jul 31, 2012 102 Sep 6, 2012 #3 Earth said: What samples did you use? Did you download BD signatures too, I recall something about using only Emsisoft sigs aren't that great. Click to expand... I used these malicious files: 349 malware samples Yes, everything was updated until I found strange.
Earth said: What samples did you use? Did you download BD signatures too, I recall something about using only Emsisoft sigs aren't that great. Click to expand... I used these malicious files: 349 malware samples Yes, everything was updated until I found strange.
D Deleted member 178 Sep 7, 2012 #4 You may have the bug that disable Bit Defender's engine, in my own test of this pack, EAM v7 caught 338/349 malwares.
You may have the bug that disable Bit Defender's engine, in my own test of this pack, EAM v7 caught 338/349 malwares.
M Malware1 Level 76 Sep 28, 2011 6,545 Sep 7, 2012 #5 In the test the BitDefender (B) and Emsisoft (A) engines are enabled (10 457 154 definitions)