Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Written Reviews - Security and Privacy
Emsisoft Anti-Malware quick review
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dex4Sure" data-source="post: 930572" data-attributes="member: 79841"><p>Do you actually actively measure resource usage? Also, do you multitask a lot or otherwise run any heavy workloads? In light usage scenario, most AV's don't show up to be performance hogs. Its only when you got multiple things running at the same time you start to see which AVs are truly light, and which are heavy.</p><p></p><p>I respectfully disagree with BD engine being one of the best on the market. First of all, they have quite a bit more false positives than ESET or Kaspersky (which admittedly are the best in this respect). Secondly, their detections are not as clear as many others. For instance, with Kaspersky or ESET you get a good idea if the detection was adware or malware and even what kind of adware or malware. With Bitdefender, not so much. Mostly all you get is generic trojan or gen variant even if the detection was adware. The detection descriptions are much more precise with some other products.</p><p></p><p>My first encounter with Bitdefender long ago (years ago) didn't leave me exactly impressed either. It literally quarantined official Spotify client as a trojan generic <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😂" title="Face with tears of joy :joy:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f602.png" data-shortname=":joy:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dex4Sure, post: 930572, member: 79841"] Do you actually actively measure resource usage? Also, do you multitask a lot or otherwise run any heavy workloads? In light usage scenario, most AV's don't show up to be performance hogs. Its only when you got multiple things running at the same time you start to see which AVs are truly light, and which are heavy. I respectfully disagree with BD engine being one of the best on the market. First of all, they have quite a bit more false positives than ESET or Kaspersky (which admittedly are the best in this respect). Secondly, their detections are not as clear as many others. For instance, with Kaspersky or ESET you get a good idea if the detection was adware or malware and even what kind of adware or malware. With Bitdefender, not so much. Mostly all you get is generic trojan or gen variant even if the detection was adware. The detection descriptions are much more precise with some other products. My first encounter with Bitdefender long ago (years ago) didn't leave me exactly impressed either. It literally quarantined official Spotify client as a trojan generic 😂 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top