Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Emsisoft Anti-Malware vs Kaspersky Total Security Comparative
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andrezj" data-source="post: 1015431" data-attributes="member: 97580"><p>nobody said you are falsifying tests</p><p></p><p>anhlab is notorious for false positives</p><p>ahnlab + only 2 "unknown av" detections, anything less than 5 detections by reputable scan engines is likely false positives</p><p>you still are relying upon what av signature tells you, you assume that if av scanner says malicious then it is malicious</p><p></p><p>you can run test, execute a file that does malicious things on system, terminates, deletes itself and never appears in killswitch, and every av scanner you use can miss it, but you would say system is clean because av scanner does not show that file</p><p></p><p>you do know that av copy signatures from each other on virustotal without ever doing analysis of their own to determine if a file actually does anything malicious?</p><p>this is well established flaw of virus total with discussions everywhere on web</p><p>you know who proved copying without analysis on virustotal? eugene kaspersky</p><p>so detection now after submission to virus total is scant eivdence that it is malicious, i can submit hundreds of safe files to virustotal that will be detected by every scan engine</p><p></p><p>this is limitation of the type of testing done, it ius not personal</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andrezj, post: 1015431, member: 97580"] nobody said you are falsifying tests anhlab is notorious for false positives ahnlab + only 2 "unknown av" detections, anything less than 5 detections by reputable scan engines is likely false positives you still are relying upon what av signature tells you, you assume that if av scanner says malicious then it is malicious you can run test, execute a file that does malicious things on system, terminates, deletes itself and never appears in killswitch, and every av scanner you use can miss it, but you would say system is clean because av scanner does not show that file you do know that av copy signatures from each other on virustotal without ever doing analysis of their own to determine if a file actually does anything malicious? this is well established flaw of virus total with discussions everywhere on web you know who proved copying without analysis on virustotal? eugene kaspersky so detection now after submission to virus total is scant eivdence that it is malicious, i can submit hundreds of safe files to virustotal that will be detected by every scan engine this is limitation of the type of testing done, it ius not personal [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top