Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jan Willy" data-source="post: 1060958" data-attributes="member: 80838">Yes, it&#039;s your interpretation. Nothing wrong with that, but I try to stay as close as possible to the intentions of the uBO-developer and of my inspirers, Kees1958 and Lenny_Fox.So the basis of my tracker blocking&nbsp; will always be dynamic filtering, without using the allow option.You allowed smartocto.com. It means that no blocking rule will be applied. At default uBO blocks three third party scripts, without breaking the site. So why allowing everything? Or is there still some blocking on DNS level?With this rule you block opening sites with uncommon TLD&#039;s. So all content (included third party content) will be blocked. No need for your rule ||*$script,frame,to=~com|~info|~io|~eu|~net|~org|~uk|~ms|~govIn fact this rule reminds of a conversion of a dynamic rule in a static rule (with whitelisting regular TLD&#039;s).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jan Willy, post: 1060958, member: 80838"] Yes, it's your interpretation. Nothing wrong with that, but I try to stay as close as possible to the intentions of the uBO-developer and of my inspirers, Kees1958 and Lenny_Fox. So the basis of my tracker blocking will always be dynamic filtering, without using the allow option. You allowed [I]smartocto.com[/I]. It means that no blocking rule will be applied. At default uBO blocks three third party scripts, without breaking the site. So why allowing everything? Or is there still some blocking on DNS level? With this rule you block opening sites with uncommon TLD's. So all content (included third party content) will be blocked. No need for your rule [I]||*$script,frame,to=~com|~info|~io|~eu|~net|~org|~uk|~ms|~gov[/I] In fact this rule reminds of a conversion of a dynamic rule in a static rule (with whitelisting regular TLD's). [/QUOTE]

Verification