Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Evjl&amp;#039;s Rain" data-source="post: 780488" data-attributes="member: 51905">a great AV should perform well in almost all testing conditions so there should be no excusesI think his testing method is okay but it&#039;s doesn&#039;t fairly compare between different products due to different samplesESET in default settings heavily and almost solely depends on its signatures without true behavior blocker. Tweaking ESET is a different story because HIPS is supposed to block everything including newly installed safe programsfor example, I don&#039;t recommend kaspersky for my friends if I don&#039;t set it up by my hands because in default settings, kaspersky is useless against PUPs, I repeat, uselessKaspersky classify PUPs in &quot;not-a-virus&quot; category so PUP detection must be enabledI have seen many PCs protected by KIS, heavily infected by PUPs and chinese softwares although KIS fully protected them against more damaging types of malware</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Evjl's Rain, post: 780488, member: 51905"] a great AV should perform well in almost all testing conditions so there should be no excuses I think his testing method is okay but it's doesn't fairly compare between different products due to different samples ESET in default settings heavily and almost solely depends on its signatures without true behavior blocker. Tweaking ESET is a different story because HIPS is supposed to block everything including newly installed safe programs for example, I don't recommend kaspersky for my friends if I don't set it up by my hands because in default settings, kaspersky is useless against PUPs, I repeat, useless Kaspersky classify PUPs in "not-a-virus" category so PUP detection must be enabled I have seen many PCs protected by KIS, heavily infected by PUPs and chinese softwares although KIS fully protected them against more damaging types of malware [/QUOTE]

Verification