Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="509322" data-source="post: 780709">This is a prevailing unrealistic expectation.The product has HIPS. HIPS still works. Using it is not difficult with a little bit of effort to learn.Ai\ML, behavioral detection, etc... it will all fail with the right test.You know it would be different if these debates actually had some merit, but they don&#039;t. People talk about products, but they don&#039;t know how they work. And they certainly don&#039;t know about malware.Either you protect the system or you don&#039;t. In this case ESET failed, but the reaction to the test is blown way out of proportion. Typical emotion-laden reactions. The points Marcos bring up are a tactic to deflect and discredit the only fact that matters... and that is that ESET failed to protect the system. So what ? ESET failed. It happens. Big deal. The reaction the test has received is disproportionate to the issue.However, I can understand where Marcos is coming from to a certain extent. &quot;Bypass&quot; videos have been made of AppGuard and when we take a close look at them they&#039;re actually not a bypass or the video only shows a portion of the entire sequence of events - for the video maker&#039;s purpose.One thing that Marcos talks about which rings true in that thread is default deny and the fact that it works. Meaning configure the ESET HIPS and learn how to use it and the nonsense is over and done with.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="509322, post: 780709"] This is a prevailing unrealistic expectation. The product has HIPS. HIPS still works. Using it is not difficult with a little bit of effort to learn. Ai\ML, behavioral detection, etc... it will all fail with the right test. You know it would be different if these debates actually had some merit, but they don't. People talk about products, but they don't know how they work. And they certainly don't know about malware. Either you protect the system or you don't. In this case ESET failed, but the reaction to the test is blown way out of proportion. Typical emotion-laden reactions. The points Marcos bring up are a tactic to deflect and discredit the only fact that matters... and that is that ESET failed to protect the system. So what ? ESET failed. It happens. Big deal. The reaction the test has received is disproportionate to the issue. However, I can understand where Marcos is coming from to a certain extent. "Bypass" videos have been made of AppGuard and when we take a close look at them they're actually not a bypass or the video only shows a portion of the entire sequence of events - for the video maker's purpose. One thing that Marcos talks about which rings true in that thread is default deny and the fact that it works. Meaning configure the ESET HIPS and learn how to use it and the nonsense is over and done with. [/QUOTE]

Verification